We have been getting into our sites to assess recovery after the 2019-20 fires (this has often required the 4WD winch and a chainsaw to clear the way in). Superficially, plants appear to be recovering, as in the following image of the main track into Gibratar Range National Park.

This is hardly surprising – the Australian vegetation has been adapting to fire over millions of years. What it may be having problems adapting to, though, is increasing fire frequency. In Gibraltar Range National Park there are areas that haven’t been burnt for over 50 years but this last fire season saw that change.

Some of these long-unburnt areas adjoin patches of rainforest that have been protected by these buffer zones but even rainforests suffered in the recent fires. They also suffered in the preceding drought with many species within rainforest patches hit particularly hard, such as these walking stick palms, below.

A closer look shows some plants recovering by resprouting, like the eucalypts, and others recovering through seedling germination, like the Gibraltar Range Waratah seedlings below.

Other species show no signs of recovery yet, like Conospermum burgessiorum. We found this single adult (below) but no resprouts and no seedlings where we know there were many plants before the fire. Perhaps it is a species that will germinate in spring?

What I will be particularly interested to see is how the pollinators recover!

Recently we acquired a new garden addition that came with an unexpected bonus. We bought a Gardenia; but didn’t notice it had at least one passenger – a moth caterpillar! We found out when we saw the adult visiting our Buddlejas 🙂

Cephanodes spp moths are a group of hawkmoths in which the larvae feed on various members of the Rubiaceae family, including Gardenias. The larvae pupate in the soil – maybe that’s how it snuck through! What a beautiful creature to see in our own back yard 🙂

We just published a paper showing pollinators experienced higher levels of reproductive success in isolated trees at a fig species’ expanding range margin, in spite of there being lower numbers of pollinators in these isolated trees (half as many) as there were in larger populations of fig trees. This increase in reproductive success was partly a consequence of parasitoid release (Mackay KD, Gross CL, Ryder DS., Increased reproductive success through parasitoid release at a range margin: Implications for range shifts induced by climate change. J Biogeogr. 2020;00:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13795).

The ‘insect apocalypse’ is a theme that has been taken up as a popular discussion point lately, driven in part by recent papers such as ‘Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers’ by Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys. Those of us who work in this area – entomologists, insect ecologists and others – have been aware of declines in insect abundance and diversity for decades. Unfortunately, because our understanding of these declines is limited there are multiple views, and multiple claims and counter-claims made concerning the geographic and taxonomic extents of these declines; and the discussion has become somewhat emotional at times…like all worthwhile discussions! What I think we can all agree on is that old chestnut: ‘more work needs to be done’. In the meantime, as more work is done and our understanding improves, let’s welcome all the sources of information available and all the different points of view and let’s keep the discussion going!

A preprint of a very interesting paper was published this month on the subject of bee decline: Eduardo E. Zattara and Marcelo A. Aizen, Global Bee Decline. Dec. 10, 2019; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/869784. They found the numbers of collected bee species recorded in global occurrence records sourced from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility have decline today to half of those recorded in the 1950s.

The image above is of Exoneura bicolor on a flower of Leptospermum novae-angliae, the New England Tea-tree. This tea tree (a shrub) is a ‘co-factor’ in the pollination ecology of a threatened species on native mint, Prostanthera staurophylla – known as a co-factor because it provides nectar to pollinators on which P. staurophylla depends and is therefore an important component of P. staurophylla‘s plant-pollinator network. There are only about 100 plants of P. staurophylla left in the wild. We are currently working out the species’ pollination needs and also working closely with the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment on a translocation experiment to establish some back-up populations of this endangered plant.